Everything we publish — competitor comparisons, how-to guides, and policy pages — follows the same standards for research, accuracy, dating, disclosure, and correction. This page is the standard we hold ourselves to, and the one you can hold us to.
01Who writes and reviews
Content is written and maintained in-house by the Clanry team — people with first-hand experience running AI-creator businesses and navigating platform bans. Drafts may be assisted by AI tooling, but every published page is reviewed and edited by a human before it ships.
02Research & sourcing
- Primary sources first. When we describe a competitor’s policy, fee, or custody model, we base it on that company’s own published terms, pricing, and documentation wherever possible.
- Operating experience. Where we speak from experience running AI-creator businesses or the platform itself, we say so.
- No fabricated specifics. We do not invent numbers, quotes, or policy language. If we are unsure, we qualify it or leave it out.
03Accuracy & fairness
- Verifiable axes. Comparisons stick to documented, checkable points — policy, fees, custody, payment rails, content rules.
- Competitor disclosure. We are a competitor to the platforms we compare against, and we say so. We do not misrepresent a rival’s policy to win an argument.
- Opinion labeled as opinion. Analysis and recommendations are framed as ours, separate from verifiable fact.
04Dating & updates
Guides and policy pages carry a published and/or last-updated date. We review pages when a competitor changes its terms, a payment rail changes, or the law shifts. Material changes update the date.
05Corrections
If we get something wrong, we fix it. Spotted an error — a mis-stated policy, an outdated fee, a broken claim? Email [email protected] with the page and the correction, and we will review it. Substantive corrections are noted on the page.
